AC buffs targets into negative AC's to add damage #1071

New Issue

Nave · 2024-10-04T20:26:44+02:00

Nave commented

2024-10-04 20:26:44 +02:00

Report link

https://bytebin.project-rk.com/SDoVEw95

Reproduction steps

Use agent debuff perks (Armor Piercing Shot, Soften Up)
Watch damage increase by a lot more than the target is supposed to have AC's and increase way beyond your damage range

Expected results

Expected results even if target is 0 AC to be max possible damage range of weapon*AR+AddDamage.

Actual results

Damage is a lot higher than it should be.

Bug prevalence

Every time AC debuffs are used.

Description & Attachments

Nothing else to add

### Report link https://bytebin.project-rk.com/SDoVEw95 ### Reproduction steps 1. Use agent debuff perks (Armor Piercing Shot, Soften Up) 2. Watch damage increase by a lot more than the target is supposed to have AC's and increase way beyond your damage range 3. ### Expected results Expected results even if target is 0 AC to be max possible damage range of weapon*AR+AddDamage. ### Actual results Damage is a lot higher than it should be. ### Bug prevalence Every time AC debuffs are used. ### Description & Attachments Nothing else to add

kajori added the

labels 2024-10-05 15:00:55 +02:00

kajori commented

2024-10-05 15:02:23 +02:00

Confirmed.

We are probably not capping ACs at zero.

Confirmed. We are probably not capping ACs at zero.

portaler added the

state

fixed

label 2024-10-08 18:46:28 +02:00

kajori commented

2024-10-08 19:10:04 +02:00

It looks like we're correctly capping AC's at zero now :)

Closing this as fixed

It looks like we're correctly capping AC's at zero now :) <img width="395" alt="{EBD62566-7604-4502-8F66-5A4D69D857D9}" src="attachments/c8253ff2-4589-40cc-b07f-bf67fa060793"> Closing this as fixed

{EBD62566-7604-4502-8F66-5A4D69D857D9}.png

182 KiB

kajori closed this issue

2024-10-08 19:10:04 +02:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

2 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: prk/issues#1071