prk/issues
26
3
Fork 0
Code Issues 425 Pull requests Projects 2 Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Lack of aggression with grey mobs #1246

New issue
Closed
opened 2025-01-19 17:46:01 +00:00 by Kresnika · 4 comments
Kresnika commented 2025-01-19 17:46:01 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Report link

https://bytebin.project-rk.com/jV8wcuB4

Reproduction steps

  1. .Tp 183.4 269.5 y 31.3 1931
  2. Run infront of Defender of the Three
  3. No aggression

Expected results

Defender of the Three should attack despite being grey.

Actual results

Not reacting despite being infront of him

Bug prevalence

Everytime

Description & Attachments

-I must add this ticket is not limited to just ToTw, TotW was just the easiest place to line Live and PRK characters up to check.

From live:

From PRK:

### Report link https://bytebin.project-rk.com/jV8wcuB4 ### Reproduction steps 1. .Tp 183.4 269.5 y 31.3 1931 2. Run infront of Defender of the Three 3. No aggression ### Expected results Defender of the Three should attack despite being grey. ### Actual results Not reacting despite being infront of him ### Bug prevalence Everytime ### Description & Attachments -I must add this ticket is not limited to just ToTw, TotW was just the easiest place to line Live and PRK characters up to check. From live: <video src="attachments/b92e902d-e609-48cb-8807-a7c689cb3a73" title="Anarchy Online - Engi2 2025-01-19 17-39-30.mp4" controls></video> From PRK: <video src="attachments/eb96a527-8962-49e9-be2f-10c81cce1882" title="Anarchy Online - Kellymp 2025-01-19 17-44-59.mp4" controls></video>
Anarchy Online - Engi2 2025-01-19 17-39-30.mp4
41 MiB
Anarchy Online - Kellymp 2025-01-19 17-44-59.mp4
29 MiB
Kresnika added the
state
new
type
bug
 labels 2025-01-19 17:46:01 +00:00
7R011 commented 2025-06-06 01:59:51 +00:00
Copy link

Can confirm this behavior was still present in TOTW.

Can confirm this behavior was still present in TOTW.
madcow added
area
npc-behavior
state
verified
priority
3
 and removed
state
new
 labels 2025-06-25 19:38:59 +00:00
madcow commented 2025-06-25 19:40:51 +00:00
Member
Copy link

I'm a bit conflicted if this is prio 4 or prio 3.. but as it is now, since Social Aggro isn't implemented I'll keep it as priority 3. calling it area npc-behavior as well

I'm a bit conflicted if this is prio 4 or prio 3.. but as it is now, since Social Aggro isn't implemented I'll keep it as priority 3. calling it area npc-behavior as well
Raggy commented 2026-02-14 22:56:24 +00:00
Member
Copy link

A fix for this is now on Ergo. Please retest.

A fix for this is now on Ergo. Please retest.
Raggy added
state
fixed
 and removed
state
verified
 labels 2026-02-14 22:56:30 +00:00
dragennd commented 2026-02-15 00:38:01 +00:00
Member
Copy link

Tested this in TOTW. DOT attacks onsite as expected. Other mobs which previously did not attack due to being grey to the target (i.e. GOT, Eternal Guardians) also now attack. Closing bug.

Tested this in TOTW. DOT attacks onsite as expected. Other mobs which previously did not attack due to being grey to the target (i.e. GOT, Eternal Guardians) also now attack. Closing bug.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
master
470-items-duplicate-during-trade
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
area
blabot
Related to NPC dialog/conversations

  
area
client
This issue is (or appears to be) client-side

  
area
encounters
Related to scripted encounters

  
area
items

  
area
launcher
Related to the launcher

  
area
loot

  
area
missions
Related to randomly generated missions

  
area
npc-behavior
Related to NPC/monster behaviour

  
area
organizations
All functions related to player organizations should be organized under this label

  
area
pathing

  
area
performance
Caused by or related to server performance issues

  
area
pets
Related to pets

  
area
portal
Related to the player portal website

  
area
quests
Issues relating to quests

  
area
rdb
Caused by RDB issues

  
area
scripted

  
area
teams
Issues relating to teaming with other players

  
area
trading
Related to trading with vendors and/or other players

  
area
zone

  
priority
1
Crashes playfield/server/other players or is game-breaking in a major way

  
priority
2
Crashes/breaks a character, significant gameplay impact with no workaround

  
priority
3
Standard or significant gameplay impact with workaround

  
priority
4
Trivial or minor gameplay impact, with or without workaround, or visual only

  
shadowlands

Related only to Shadowlands content

  
state
cant-reproduce
Can't be recreated by another tester

  
state
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
state
fixed
Developer has rolled out changes, needs re-tested to confirm fixed

  
state
new
Needs to be (re-)tested to ensure the issue is reproducible

  
state
unrefined
Needs more detail, repro steps or to be cleaned up

  
state
verified

  
state
wontfix
This will not be worked on

  
type
bug
An implemented feature is not working correctly

  
type
enhancement
Unimplemented feature, new feature / request

No labels
area
blabot
area
client
area
encounters
area
items
area
launcher
area
loot
area
missions
area
npc-behavior
area
organizations
area
pathing
area
performance
area
pets
area
portal
area
quests
area
rdb
area
scripted
area
teams
area
trading
area
zone
priority
1
priority
2
priority
3
priority
4
shadowlands
state
cant-reproduce
state
duplicate
state
fixed
state
new
state
unrefined
state
verified
state
wontfix
type
bug
type
enhancement
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
5 participants
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: prk/issues#1246
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?